It would appear that Wikileaks is commercially driven... big fat hairy surprise.

Read this: Wikileaks are for-hire mercenaries - Cryptome.

Wouldn't surprise me one bit if it's true. The reading between the lines on all recent leaks on wikileaks seems garnered to be sensationalistic crap (with the possible exception of the BNP membership list, which was actually quite public spirited).

Oh, and in my view, naming it Wikileaks is, by the way, insulting to the wiki system, and not a little bit misleading. Look into what the wikipedia and wiki style system is all about if you're at all confused (google it).